Low Adoption of Video Consultations in Post-COVID-19 General Practice in Northern Europe: Barriers to Use and Potential Action Points.

In the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic, video consultation was introduced in general practice in many countries around the world as a solution to provide remote health care to patients. It was assumed that video consultation would find widespread adoption in post-COVID-19 general practice. However, adoption rates remain low across countries in Northern Europe, suggesting that barriers to its use exist among general practitioners and other practice staff. In this viewpoint, we take a comparative approach, reflecting on similarities and differences in implementation conditions of video consultations in 5 Northern European countries' general practice settings that might have created barriers to its use within general practice. We convened at a cross-disciplinary seminar in May 2022 with researchers and clinicians from 5 Northern European countries with expertise in digital care in general practice, and this viewpoint emerged out of dialogues from that seminar. We have reflected on barriers across general practice settings in our countries, such as lacking technological and financial support for general practitioners, that we feel are critical for adoption of video consultation in the coming years. Furthermore, there is a need to further investigate the contribution of cultural elements, such as professional norms and values, to adoption. This viewpoint may inform policy work to ensure that a sustainable level of video consultation use can be reached in the future, one that reflects the reality of general practice settings rather than policy optimism.

[Quality Indicators for Video Consultations in Primary Care - a Scoping Review]. / Qualitätsindikatoren für Videosprechstunden in der hausärztlichen Versorgung ­ ein Scoping Review.

AIM: The German ban on remote treatment was relaxed in 2018. The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic ultimately ensured a surge in the implementation of video consultations as part of telemedicine in primary care. However, the question of how the quality of this form of care is represented is currently unanswered. The aim of this review was to identify criteria for assessing the quality of video consultations in primary care. METHODS: As part of this review, a literature search was carried out in the databases PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, Open Gray and Google. We searched for literature on quality criteria or quality indicators for telemedicine. German and English-language literature was included, there was no limit on publication date. RESULTS: A total of 14 publications were included in the review. Out of the quality criteria identified, 13 quality indicators were derived. Of these, seven were for structural quality, two for process quality and four indicators for outcome quality. For instance, the switch to face-to-face treatment for those cases for which it was required, staff qualifications and access to this type of care were identified as possible indicators. CONCLUSION: The quality indicators proposed in this article enable a structured evaluation of the quality of video consultations in primary care through their measurability. Further development of these indicators in order to define threshold values for the stated goals appears to be warranted.

The ambulatory care of patients with post-acute sequelae of COVID-19

Background There is an increasing number of patients that do not make a rapid or full recovery from a SARS-CoV-2 infection, the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) and suffer from the so-called "long-COVID” or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC). The long-term implications for health services are expected to be substantial. The objective of this analysis was to estimate the utilization of outpatient services from primary and secondary care. Further, we evaluated the multidisciplinary ambulatory care management of PASC patients in Germany. Methods All members of the Physician network "MEDI Baden-Württemberg e.V.”, i.e., 1,263 primary care physicians (PCPs) and 1,772 specialists working in secondary care were invited to participate in a questionnaire surveying routine data regarding the general care situation at the physician practice level of patients suffering from PASC. Bivariate analyses were applied to consider potential differences between primary and secondary care. Results In total, 194 physicians participated in this survey (response rates of 9.6% (primary care) and 4.1% (secondary care). On average, each physician treated 31.9 PASC patients. Most PASC patients (61.2%) had three or more long-COVID symptoms. On average, 10.6 PASC patients visited a physicians' practice per quarter. The additional consulting effort for treating PASC patients was 34.1 min (median: 20 min) and higher in primary care. Most PCPs (71.1%) integrated secondary care in the treatment of their PASC patients. Less than half of the PASC patients (42.0%) sought secondary care with a referral from primary care. 5.7 patients visited the physicians' practices per week, who were concerned about suffering from PASC without any following medical confirmation. This caused an average additional effort for the physicians of 17.5 min per visit. There were no differences between rural and urban areas. Conclusion Our results reveal that there is a substantial additional consulting effort for treating PASC patients that is especially high in primary care. The additional consulting effort results from the consultation of a particular high number of patients that are concerned about suffering from PACS without a following medical confirmation. To guarantee a high quality and adequate provision of care for a potentially further increasing number of concerned patients, the ambulatory health services should be strengthened and adequately compensated. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43999-023-00020-y.

The use of routine data from primary care practices in Germany to analyze the impact of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization of primary care services for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

BACKGROUND: Routinely collected health data from ambulatory care providers offer a wide range of research opportunities. However, the access is often (e.g., technically) hindered, particularly in Germany. In the following, we describe the development of an infrastructure for the analysis of pseudonymized routine data extracted from primary care practices in Germany. Further, we analyze the impact of the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 on the utilization of primary care services for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM type 2). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, routine data were extracted from nine private primary care practices before and since the outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 in Germany. The sample consisted of patients who were treated between 2016 and 2022 in one of the participating practices. The effects of the outbreak on the frequency of practice visits and the disease course of DM type 2 patients were analyzed by means of bivariate and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: The developed infrastructure offers an analysis of routine data from outpatient care within 24 h. In total, routine data of 30,734 patients could be processed for the analyses with 4182 (13.6%) patients having a diagnosed DM type 2 and 59.0% of these patients were enrolled in a disease management program (DMP). In the multivariate analysis, there was a significant negative effect of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on utilization of outpatient services of patients with DM type 2 disease. This decrease was less pronounced among DMP patients. The glycated haemoglobin level (HbA1c) has not changed significantly. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that the analysis of routine data from outpatient care in Germany is possible in a timely manner using a special developed electronic health record system and corresponding software. The significantly negative effect of the SARS-CoV-2 outbreak on utilization of outpatient services of patients with DM type 2 disease was less pronounced among DMP patients. Two years after the start of the Covid pandemic a significantly worsened course of illness cannot be observed. However, it must be taken into account that the observation period for clinically relevant outcomes is still relatively short.

[Experiences with Video-Based Assessment under Pandemic-Related Contact Restrictions]. / Erfahrungen mit videobasiertem Assessment in Zeiten pandemiebedingter Kontaktbeschränkungen.

Background: Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) examinations were cancelled in the short term. This project described how to offer medical students an alternative assessment at Miller's competence level of "shows how". Methods: Students produced videos in which they can be seen performing various physical examinations related to family medicine consultations. Trained assessors rated the videos uploaded to the learning platform and gave verbal feedback if requested. Results: The grading (65 "very good" and 38 "good") was very mild. Twelve per cent of the students requested verbal feedback. Their evaluation of the procedure was mixed. The evaluators consistently assessed their task and the process as positive. Technically, the video-based assessment could be implemented without any problems. Conclusions: The short-term implementation of a video-based assessment in the context of medical education proved to be feasible. It could serve not only as an emergency solution under a pandemic, but also as an additional opportunity for formative feedback in the future.

Bridging the Gap Between Competencies and Uncertainties in Postgraduate Training in Family Medicine: Results and Psychometric Properties of a Self-Assessment Questionnaire.

Purpose: One of the reasons for postgraduate trainees not to choose working in a rural area is uncertainty related to the lack of competencies. The aim of this study was to investigate the concept of uncertainty by measuring competencies and to examine the psychometric properties of an instrument that measures competencies related to uncertainty in the self-assessment of postgraduate trainees in family medicine. Patients and Methods: A questionnaire was created based on pre-existing instruments. It was distributed to participants of postgraduate training seminars in the federal states of Baden-Württemberg and Schleswig-Holstein, Germany in 2016. Descriptive statistics and a partial correlation analysis were calculated for measuring the degree of association between year of postgraduate training and items' responses. Psychometric properties were assessed by calculating descriptive item analysis, factor analysis and internal consistency. Results: The response rate was 85% (105/124). More than one-fifth of the participants stated to show only seldom or sometimes the following skills: ability to balance work and life (N=25, 24%), letting a mild disorder run its own way (N=24, 23%) and ability to conduct interventions that decreased aggression from the patient (N=22, 21%). More than half of the participants felt (very) insecure in performing routine child check-ups, the application of a below elbow backslab and the partial removal of a toenail. Nine out of 21 items showed positive statistically significant correlation between level of competence and progress in training. Factor analysis led to a final instrument with 12 items (Cronbach's α=0.736) and a three-factor-structure: "doctor well-being and resilience", "communication" and "skills". Conclusion: In order to reduce uncertainty with all its consequences, a focus on teaching of competencies regarding the physicians' well-being and resilience, communication and skills has to be continued in postgraduate training.

Facilitators and barriers for the implementation of telemedicine from a local government point of view - a cross-sectional survey in Germany.

BACKGROUND: Telemedicine offers additional ways of delivering medical care, e.g., in primary care in rural areas. During the last decades, projects including telemedicine are being implemented worldwide. However, implementation of telemedicine is in some countries, e.g., Germany somewhat slower compared to northern European countries. One important part of successful implementation is to include the citizen perspective. The aims of this study were to explore the perception of representatives of the local government regarding telemedicine in the context of a perceived GP shortage and to tailor future telemedicine offers according to these perceived needs. METHODS: Considering the multidisciplinary assessment suggested by the Model for Assessment of Telemedicine a questionnaire with 19 questions was developed by identifying determinants of telemedicine out the literature. After pre-testing, the questionnaire was sent to all 2199 mayors from the federal states of Schleswig-Holstein (North Germany) and Baden-Württemberg (South Germany) as representatives of the citizens (cross- sectional study; full population survey). The final questionnaire contained sections for socio-demographic data, telemedicine and perceived GP shortage. All responses from November 2018 until 2019 were included and analyzed descriptively. RESULTS: The response rate was 32% (N = 699), of which 605 were included in the analysis. A majority of the participants stated they live in a rural area and 46% were in the office for up to 8 years. The mayors had predominantly a positive perception about telemedicine (60%) and 76% of them stated, their community would benefit from telemedicine. A GP shortage was reported by 39% of the participants. The highest risk of telemedicine was seen in misdiagnosing. In case of an emergency situation 291 (45%) of the participants considered data privacy as not as relevant. Mayors from a community with a perceived GP shortage had a more negative perception regarding telemedicine. CONCLUSION: The acceptance of telemedicine is rapidly rising compared to former studies. Communities with a perceived GP shortage had a more negative perception. Barriers like data security concerns were seen as less important in case of an emergency. The highest risk of telemedicine was seen in misdiagnosing. These findings need to be considered in designing future telemedicine offers.

Experiences made by family physicians managing patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection during spring 2020 - a cross-sectional analysis.

BACKGROUND: In Germany, family physicians care for about 85% of the patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. The geographic distribution of the first wave in 2020 was heterogeneous, and each federal state experienced different percentages of patients that died from COVID-19. Each of the 16 federal states implemented its own regulation about medical care for SARS-CoV-2 infected patients. Against this background, the objective of this analysis was to gather experiences made by primary care physicians managing SARS-CoV-2 infected patients during the first wave in March 2020 and to clinically characterize these patients. METHODS: In total, 5,632 physicians were invited to participate in an online questionnaire surveying routine data regarding the general care situation at the physician practice level and the care for patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were applied to characterize treatment experiences and to identify patient characteristics predicting the course of disease. RESULTS: 132 family physicians from all German federal states (except from Berlin) participated in this analysis (response rate 2.3%) and provided routine care data for 1,085 patients. Information from 373 of these patients were provided in greater detail. On average, each physician treated 8.5 patients infected with SARS-CoV-2. About 15% of the physicians used video consultations to communicate with their infected patients. More than 82% made positive experiences with the exceptional regulation to provide a certificate of incapacity to work by telephone. Half of the physicians faced equipment insufficiencies due to a lack of protective gear, and in 10% of the practices, the staff themselves acquired SARS-CoV-2 infection. Greater numbers of SARS-CoV-2 cases treated in a practice translated into higher odds for members of the practice to get infected (odds ratio (OR) 1.03, 95% CI [1.01;1.06]). Older persons, males and patients in rural areas had higher odds of a severe course of disease. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that a large percentage of primary care physicians additionally managed their COVID-19 patients remotely by telephone or video during the outbreak, while also being at a higher risk for SARS-CoV-2 infection. Further, the increased severity in rural areas underlines the importance of strong primary health care in order to enable hospitals to concentrate on critically ill patients.

Diagnostic performance of deep-learning-based screening methods for diabetic retinopathy in primary care-A meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Diabetic retinopathy (DR) affects 10-24% of patients with diabetes mellitus type 1 or 2 in the primary care (PC) sector. As early detection is crucial for treatment, deep learning screening methods in PC setting could potentially aid in an accurate and timely diagnosis. PURPOSE: The purpose of this meta-analysis was to determine the current state of knowledge regarding deep learning (DL) screening methods for DR in PC. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was conducted using Medline, Web of Science, and Scopus to identify suitable studies. STUDY SELECTION: Suitable studies were selected by two researchers independently. Studies assessing DL methods and the suitability of these screening systems (diagnostic parameters such as sensitivity and specificity, information on datasets and setting) in PC were selected. Excluded were studies focusing on lesions, applying conventional diagnostic imaging tools, conducted in secondary or tertiary care, and all publication types other than original research studies on human subjects. DATA EXTRACTION: The following data was extracted from included studies: authors, title, year of publication, objectives, participants, setting, type of intervention/method, reference standard, grading scale, outcome measures, dataset, risk of bias, and performance measures. DATA SYNTHESIS AND CONCLUSION: The summed sensitivity of all included studies was 87% and specificity was 90%. Given a prevalence of DR of 10% in patients with DM Type 2 in PC, the negative predictive value is 98% while the positive predictive value is 49%. LIMITATIONS: Selected studies showed a high variation in sample size and quality and quantity of available data.